NO Relief: Supreme Court Cancels Delayed PG Medical Admissions Of 8 MBBS Doctors, Says Schedule Be Should Followed Strictly

Reiterating the need for strictly adhering to the admission schedule, the Supreme Court has cancelled the Postgraduate medical admission of 8 MBBS doctors, whom the Calcutta High Court had earlier given relief.

Also Read - NMC Renews Approval For 100 MBBS Seats At MGM Medical College Indore

However, the top court bench comprising Justices Ajay Rastogi and CT Ravikumar set aside the order of the HC as it noted that the High Court had ignored the merit principles while granting provisional admissions to those doctors and later while regularising them.

Therefore, cancelling their admissions, the Supreme Court bench observed, "In our considered view, no sympathy can be shown to such students who have not only entered/admitted after May 31 of the year, but their admissions were completely in contravention to the Regulations, 2000 and provisional admissions were granted by the High Court ignoring the principle of merit which is the sole touchstone for admission to the post­graduate courses based on the NEET examination, 2019 where admissions are made strictly in the order of merit­ cum­ preference and despite the stay order passed by this Court, if they are allowed to continue in post­graduate medical courses, the same would be completely illegal and such contemptuous action on the part of the authorities, cannot be approved by this Court."

Also Read - NEET PG Counselling 2022: MCC Notifies On Round 1 Resignation Process

The case concerned eight MBBS doctors who, after clearing the NEET-PG 2019 examination, sought admission in the State quota seats in Postgraduate medical courses in medical colleges of West Bengal for the academic year 2019-2020. For the concerned year, the cut-off date for admission was May 31, 2019. However, even after the cut-off date, approximately 153 State quota PG medical seats remained vacant, and the concerned students failed in their attempt after participating in the last counselling to secure admission to post graduate medical seats in any of the specialities because of their much lower rank in the order of merit.

Also Read - IIM Fees For MBA 2022: Check Full IIM MBA Fee Structure

At this outset, the doctors approached the High Court bench. They contended that although the final round of counselling was over, PG medical seats for the academic session 2019-2020 were still lying vacant. Therefore, seeking relief, they urged the court to consider their admission against the vacant seats.

After issuing an interim order, the HC bench directed the MCI to grant provisional admission to the students. Later their admissions were regularised by the court on the ground that they had joined PG medical courses and had undergone training/education for six months and more. Challenging the order of the HC, the MCI, now NMC, approached the top court bench, which stayed the HC order.

The court noted that while one student did not continue her studies since September 2019, other students had been allowed to continue their studies by the West Bengal University of Health Sciences despite the stay order granted by the Supreme Court.

Also Read- BFUHS NEET PG COUNSELLING: 11 SEATS INCREASED IN 4 MD COURSES AT DAYANAND MEDICAL COLLEGE LUDHIANA

It was argued by the counsel for MCI that the High Court had committed an error while granting provisional admissions to these doctors after the cut-off date and also contended that admissions could not have been made on the principle of first cum first serve basis regardless of their placement in the order of merit, which is the touchstone for admissions to the Postgraduate medical courses.

Also Read - NEET MDS 2022 CUTOFF PERCENTILE LOWERED

Besides, the MCI counsel also submitted that the top court, in numerous cases, has declined prayers seeking an extension of time with the direction that the time schedule must be strictly followed.

On the other hand, the students argued that the University could not conduct the second round of counselling within the schedule and following the order of the Division bench dated May 30, 2019, the second round of counselling was conducted on May 31 and on the same day PG medical admissions had been closed. Considering this difficulty, the HC passed interim orders in the interest of justice.

The students claimed that they were deprived of participating legally in the second round of counselling held on May 31, 2019, and that was why they sought relief from the High Court. Consequently, the HC bench allowed provisional admissions without disturbing the admissions already made.

Further, the counsel for the students argued that the students were not at fault. Referring to the fact that it is the students who suffer, the counsel for the students also prayed for relief for the concerned students pointing out that they have already completed their course or are on the verge of completing the same. Therefore, cancelling their admission at this stage will not only result in their loss of three precious years, but it will also not help the NMC and other concerned authorities.

After considering the submissions made by both parties, the top court bench held.

Therefore, clarifying that no sympathy can be shown to such students who had been admitted after the cut-off date violating the Regulations, 2000, the bench noted, "Consequently, the appeals succeed and are accordingly allowed. The impugned orders passed by the High Court in the respective appeals are hereby quashed and set aside. No costs."

Further clarifying that no discretions can be allowed to grant admissions after the cut-off date, the bench further observed.

"Last date for admissions to the post­graduate medical course will not be extended after 31st May and the schedule has been prescribed in compliance of the judgments of this Court of which reference has been made in Mridul Dhar(Minor) and Another(supra) followed by this Court in Priya Gupta (supra) and Ashish Ranjan and Others(supra) and this Court has consistently held that the schedule for admission to the post­graduate medical courses must be followed strictly leaving no discretion to any authority to permit admissions over the cut­off date under schedule for admission to post­graduate medical courses i.e. 31st May."

"That even when the complaints are made to this Court that large number of seats are lying vacant seeking extension of time to fill those unfilled undergraduate/post­graduate seats of medical courses, this Court always declined such requests and directed that schedule must be strictly adhered to," the court further observed at this outset.

In this context, the top court bench further referred to previous judgments in the case of Education Promotion Society for India and Another vs. Union of India and Others, and Dr. Astha Goel and Others vs. Medical Counselling Committee and Others.

Therefore, setting aside the HC order, the bench observed, "In the given facts and circumstances, in our considered view, the interim orders passed by the High Court granting provisional admissions in the post­graduate medical courses in the months of June and July, 2019 by orders dated 04th June, 2019, 16th July,2019 and 30th July, 2019 which were later made absolute by an order dated 04th November, 2019 are not legally sustainable."

Also Read- MD In Anaesthesia : Admissions, Medical Colleges, Fee, Eligibility Criteria